Swatch Protest of 1999
In early 1999 Swatch set out to publicize its new “Swatch .beat Internet Time” by launching Beatnik, a grapefruit‑size “mini‑Sputnik” satellite from the Mir space station. The plan was to replay user‑submitted voice clips (each had to include the word beat) on the ham radio frequencies between 145.8 and 146 MHz. Because ITU rules forbid any commercial traffic on ham frequencies, the idea threatened to turn protected radio spectrum into a marketing platform.
The hardware itself came from AMSAT‑France, which had supplied the RF boards under a contract that explicitly barred advertising. Only after parts were delivered did AMSAT‑France learn that the Russian Space Flight Control Center had inked a side deal with Swatch. With its legal options limited, the French team finished its work, then issued public statements distancing itself from the mission and urging hams not to publish Keplerian elements or listen for the satellite.
In February of 1999, I stumbled onto the scheme while browsing Swatch’s website. I confirmed the frequency claim and posted the first public alert. That single e‑mail snowballed into the pages below that aggregated press releases, contract excerpts, ITU citations, and template letters to regulators. The archive helped the ARRL, multiple AMSAT groups, and hundreds of individual operators coordinate a unified protest that reached the FCC, the Swiss and Russian telecom authorities, and the ITU’s Radiocommunication Bureau.
The pressure paid off. Beatnik was hand‑launched from Mir on 16 April 1999, but its transmitter stayed off; Swatch later claimed its batteries were “donated” to the cosmonauts instead. No commercial messages ever hit the airwaves, and the incident now stands as an example of 1) how a loosely connected volunteer community could safeguard their shared resource, and 2) how quickly a marketing gimmick can unravel when it collides with international radio law.
This page was originally posted on wmbc.umbc.edu and later epistolary.org in its original HTML in 1999. It is reproduced here for historical reference and research purposes. Any text updates including spelling correction and web links broken since the original are noted in footnotes.
📄️ Additional reading
Read an ARRL Audio News article by Stephan Anderman, K2SMA, entitled AMSAT-France distances itself from Sputnik project or listen to it in streaming Real Audio or WAV format (406K).
📄️ AMSAT France press release 99-04
April 13th, 1999
📄️ Letter from Bernard Pidoux regarding Beatnik
This is a letter from AMSAT-France President Bernard Pidoux, F6BVP to the other AMSAT organizations detailing the situation with the new satellite.
📄️ ARRL Audio News Transcript
From: \"Stephan M. Anderman, K2SMA\"
📄️ AMSAT-France distances itself from latest mini-Sputnik
From The ARRL Letter, Vol. 18, No. 14 dated April 2, 1999
📄️ ARLS002 ARRL Advises Swatch to Cancel "Beatnik" Launch
This was posted by the American Radio Relay League to their e-mail distribution on Wed, April 7, 1999 at 1654 EDT.
📄️ Background information
Here are some of the e-mails that I sent out since February 20, 1999 to try to get to the bottom of this whole Swatch thing. This was after visiting the URL on the Swatch site concerning the Beatnik project, http://www.swatch.com/beatnik/frameset.html which is also listed in a few of the messages below. Unfortunately, I didn\'t save any of the incoming messages, but I do have all my outgoing mails saved with some of the relevant quotes from other people attached.
📄️ Hams jam space spam
Friday, April 16, 1999 Published at 0436 UK \
📄️ Beatnik Technical Specs
Taken from a SpaceNews article that was forwarded to me via e-mail.
📄️ Bible Response
This is from a April 4, 1999 post by Steven R. Bible, N7HPR to the AMSAT-BB listserv.
📄️ Brattstrom: Where are the Amateurs?
Ted Brattstrom, NH6YK is an amateur operator in Honolulu, HI, and holds an Advanced class license from the FCC.
📄️ Bulletins
In this memo from AMSAT Russia President Eugene Labutini, RA3APR, AMSAT-R apologizes for any trouble which was brought to amateur satellite community and hope that amateurs in the entire world will understand this situation and separate AMSAT-R and SCSC. He writes that in the future AMSAT-R will \"stop any attempt from SCSC to use AMSAT-R in commercial projects\".
📄️ Sputnik-99 launch cancelled by Swatch
Jean-Pierre Haigneré verifies the satellite\'s silence
📄️ Contacting the ITU directly
On April 12, 1999, Ron Hashiro, AH6RH, received a response from the ITU regarding a request to intervene relative to the upcoming Amateur Space activity by Swatch onboard the Beatnik / Sputnik-99 / RS-19 satellite. The ITU requested that as a first step, that the matter be brought to the attention of \"the Administration responsible for Telecommunication matters in your country\". In the US, this would be the FCC.
📄️ Commercial use of ham bands in Brazil
Orlando Costa, PY2 ANE
📄️ Please notify ITU of SWATCH violations
Pete was first licensed in 1970, although his love for radio goes back to 1950, whe he first heard short wave radio at the age of 5. Pete studied morse code in the boy scouts and earned his merit badge. Pete also was a Radioman in the US Navy during the Cuban Crisis. Pete is a sorter at the 3rd Call Bureau and handles the 3X and 3Y calls. Pete sends a QSL to every DX contact he makes on the first QSO on every band. Pete has logged over 5,000 QSO\'s in just the last 5 months, and averages 12,000 QSO\'s a year. He has just printed 15,000 new cards of which over 5,000 have already been sent! Pete\'s station consists of a Yaesu FT-1000MP with the MD-100 microphone (uses the heil boom mike for contests only), a Henry 3K-A Amplifier (usually running 1000 watts output), a Force 12, 8 element C4 yagi at 65\' on Rohn 25G tower for the 10-40 meter and WARC bands, and a 45\' Gap Voyager Vertical for 80 & 160 Meters. He says the TL in his call stands for \"TOO LOUD!\". Pete says \"LOUD is GOOD!\".
📄️ Second open letter to the amateur radio community
April 7, 1999 10:45 EDT rcarls2@umbc.edu
📄️ Ham operators get up in arms over the silliest things
This is from a April 4, 1999 post by Mike Gilchrist, KF4FDJ, to the AMSAT-BB listserv.
📄️ Plaintext mirror of the Swatch Beatnik web-site
To view the actual pages, go here.
📄️ Information
Read my open letter to the amateur community, which explains what Swatch is doing, how it affects you as an amateur radio operator, and why I\'m advocating an immediate boycott of Swatch products until this issue is resolved. You can also review some background information to understand how this situation occured and how I found out about it.
📄️ Issue
Keep the amateur bands free . . . of spam!
📄️ Links to the Swatch Protest
- Michael Krochmal, VK3KRO\'s Links
📄️ Media Coverage of the Swatch Protest
Rob Carlson, KC2AEI
📄️ Messano: How far will they go?
Daniel R. Messano, KE4RAP, is an amateur operator in Augusta, GA, and holds a Technician class lice nse from the FCC.
📄️ Problems with the Swatch project
Ed Mitchell, KF7VY, publishes one of the world\'s most popular amateur radio web sites, Ham Radio Online at http://hamradio-online.com. He has been licensed since the early 1970s and has been involved in many aspects of ham radio, including HF, VHF, UHF, satellites, ARES/RACES, packet radio, ATV, and much more. Professionally, he has worked in the computer engineering field for 18 years. He is a member of the ARRL, AMSAT, SETILeague and the IEEE.
📄️ Excerpt: Half computer, half world radio
By Gary Krakow\
📄️ Is the cure worse than the disease?
Stewart Nelson, KK7KA, is an amateur operator in Reno, NV, and holds an Advanced class license from the FCC.
📄️ No Code International response to Swatch
Carl R. Stevenson, WA6VSE, of No Code International sent me the following is a protest message sent to Swatch by his organization. As this protest message to Swatch states, they have lodged formal protests with the appropriate government agencies, both US and in the countries involved, Switzerland and Russia, as well as contacting other amateur organizations and asking them to join in. Take a look at the articles and links on the NCI web site, including the contact information which I\'ve referenced in the ITU Contact Information page on this site.
📄️ Open letter to the amateur community
Dear editors, Loop readers, list readers, and assorted amateur friends,
📄️ Opinion articles
Ted Brattstrom, NH6YK, in \"Where are the Amateurs?\" writes about the future of amateur satellites and the inevitable successors to the Beatnik if we let it pass unaccosted. Anyone for PizzaSat?
📄️ Russian And Frenchman Perform Space Walk
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/ts/story.html?s=v/nm/19990416/ts/spacerussiamir_1.html
📄️ Letter from Eugene Labutin regarding Beatnik
This is a letter from AMSAT Russia Eugene Labutin, RA3APR, to the other AMSAT organizations apologizing for the situation with the new satellite.
📄️ Компьютерра: Время и деньги
Время и деньги
📄️ Swatch Beatnik controversy
Originally posted at http://www.ryan.thiessen.com/swatch/newsapr99/07news_02.htm which is no longer available.
📄️ Sample comment
Cut and past this comment and edit as necessary to suit your opinion.
📄️ Swatch scare
On Thursday, April 15, 1999, Swatch had apparently cancelled the mission! However, a Reuters news report dated Friday April 16 8
📄️ Schleichwerbung aus dem All?
Swatch verärgert Amateur-Funker
📄️ Russian And Frenchman Perform Space Walk
http://www.spaceviews.com/1999/04/11b.html
📄️ Swatch's satellite broadcasts upset radio amateurs
Originally posted at http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/99/04/11/stiinnnws01008.html?3377419 which is no longer available.
📄️ Beatnik is in Orbit
Swatch company press release
📄️ Mirror site: Swatch replies to hams
Mirror of the Swatch company's reply to the amateur radio community
📄️ About Swatch
Benjamin, OH3BK, notes that Swatch Group also owns Oscilloquartz, a well-known manufacturer of high precision oscillators that are used in communications equipment. Hams have a lot of decision power when manufacturers purchase parts e.g. for their cellular base stations.
📄️ Thanks
Thanks to Ed Mitchell, KF7VY of the Ham Radio Online news web site for reposting my article and a link to this page. Thanks to the Amateur Radio Caravan Club of New Mexico for helping to spread the word. Thanks to the NASA Watch portal site in Reston, VA for their link to this site, which has already brought in several non-amateur astrophiles. Thanks to the STENSAT PICOSATELLITE site and Hank Heidt, N4AFL for their link. Please link to this site from your own pages in order to help spread the word. If you do link here, please e-mail me at rcarls2@umbc.edu so that I can return the favor.
📄️ Swatch allows launch, downplays financial interest
Update, April 8, 1999: Dear Readers, this will be the last major update for this site until this issue is resolved one way or another. I've taken too much time away from my studies in maintaining this page, and I have a number of important papers due next week. However, this shouldn't be a problem. As I see it, there are only two distinct paths that can be taken from here. Which one is chosen by Swatch depends entirely on whether or not the satellite begins to transmit on amateur frequencies on or around April 16, 1999.
📄️ Williamson: Swatch sponsorship all bad?
This is from a post on April 4, 1999 by Paul Williamson, KB5MU to the AMSAT-BB listserv.
📄️ Spam That's Out of This World
Preserved from original URL http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/18968.html which is no longer available.
📄️ Swatch 'Saves' MIR
Preserved from original URL http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/19185.html which is no longer available.